Highlights
- •Methodological flaws in predicting clinical outcome can be catastrophic.
- •Correct prediction of clinical outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage using computed tomography.
- •How to predict a clinical outcome?
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Early prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using computed tomography texture analysis.J Clin Neurosci. 2020; 71: 144-149
- Clinical epidemiology: principles, methods, and applications for clinical research.Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2009
- Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?.BMJ. 2009; 338
- Epidemiology beyond the basics.3rd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publisher, Manhattan, New York2014
- What does need to know about developing clinical prediction models?.J Geriatr Oncol. 2019; 10: 369
- Methodological issues on prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virologic responses.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 1419
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 13, 2020
Accepted:
January 5,
2020
Received:
September 25,
2019
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
