Advertisement
Regular Article| Volume 7, SUPPLEMENT A, 88-91, September 2000

Surgical resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformation combined with pre-operative embolisation

        This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

        Abstract

        To assess the importance of pre-operative embolisation, 27 cases of cerebral artriovenous malformation (AVM) treated in this institute between July 1994 and October 1998 were analysed. The patients’ ages ranged from 3 to 70 years (average 36.9) with a follow-up period of 1–41 months (average 19.2). The patient presented with haemorrhage in 21 cases and seizure in five. In 21 of 27 cases, surgical resection of a nidus was performed, gamma knife therapy was applied in three and conservative therapy was chosen in three. Of 21 cases treated surgically, total removal was achieved in 19 cases and a residual nidus was seen in one (a large basal ganglia AVM). In the remaining case, postoperative angiography was not available. Pre-operative embolisation followed by surgical resection of the nidus was performed in seven cases in which there was a large AVM. A volume index was calculated to indicate the size of the nidus using X × Y × Z, where X is the maximum diameter (cm) of the nidus on the lateral angiogram, Y is the diameter (cm) perpendicular to X and Z is the maximum diameter (cm) on the anteroposter or angiogram. The index averaged 45.9 for the cases in which pre-operative embolisation was performed, while it was 5.6 in the cases without embolisation. Pre-operative embolisation was performed to reduce the nidus flow as much as possible, to prevent overload to the surrounding structures. At surgery, the nidus was resected from the surrounding tissue and care was taken not to enter the nidus. Postoperatively, the systolic blood pressure was maintained at 90–100 mmHg for several days in the intensive care unit. The results were excellent in 15 cases, good in three (hemiparesis due to the initial haemorrhage remained in all three), fair in one (a patient with a severe subarachnoid haemorrhage). Two patients died (acute pulmonary oedema and severe meningitis). Minor postoperative bleeding or oozing was seen in three cases. In conclusion, reducing the shunt flow through a nidus in a step-wise fashion with pre-operative embolisation of a large AVM seems to be quite helpful in preventing postoperative haemodynamic overload to the surrounding brain. It is also important not to enter the nidus when it is removed at surgery. This helps to prevent intraoperative and/or postoperative bleeding, and led to successful total removal of the nidus with a good postoperative course.

        Keywords

        To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

        Purchase one-time access:

        Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
        One-time access price info
        • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
        • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

        Subscribe:

        Subscribe to Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
        Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
        Already an online subscriber? Sign in
        Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

        References

        REFERENCES

          • Kobayashi S.
          • Hongo K.
          • Bhagwati S.N.
          • Rappaport Z.H.
          • Lawton M.T.
          • Spetzler R.F.
          Management of arteriovenous malformations: Part II.
          Surg Neurol. 1997; 48: 2-6
          • Tew J.
          • Levis A.I.
          • Reichert K.W.
          Management strategies and surgical techniques for deep-seated supratentorial arteriovenous malformations.
          Neurosurgery. 1995; 36: 1065-1072
          • Deruty R.
          • Pelissou-Guyotat I.
          • Mottolese A.C.
          • Bascoulergue
          • Turjman F.
          • Gerard J.P.
          Multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
          Neurol Res. 1995; 17: 169-177
          • Sasaki T.
          • Kurita H.
          • Saito I.
          • Kawamoto S.
          • Nemoto S.
          • Terahara A.
          • Kirino T.
          • Takakura K.
          Arteriovenous malformations in the basal ganglia and thalamus: management and results in 101 cases.
          J Neurosurg. 1998; 88: 285-292
          • Rosenblatt S.
          • Lewis A.I.
          • Tew J.M.
          Combined interventional and surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations.
          Neuroimaging Clin North Am. 1998; 8: 469-482
          • Young V.L.
          • Kader A.
          • Ornstein E.
          • Baker K.
          • Ostapkovich N.
          • Pile-spellman J.
          • Fogarty-Mack P.
          • Stein B.
          Cerebral hyperemia after arteriovenous malformation resection is related to “breakthrough” complications but not to feeding artery pressure.
          Neurosurgery. 1996; 38: 1085-1095
          • Deruty R.
          • Amat D.
          • Mottolese C.
          • Bascoulergue Y.
          • Turjman F.
          • Gerard J.P.
          Complications after multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
          Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996; 138: 119-131
          • Hongo K.
          • Kobayashi S.
          • Takemae T.
          • Nakagawa H.
          • Mabuchi S.
          Staged surgery for a large cerebral arteriovenous malformation to prevent the overload phenomenon.
          J Clin Neurosci. 1998; 5 (Suppl 1): 84-86
          • Takemae T.
          • Kobayashi S.
          • Sugita K.
          Perinidal hypervascular network on immediate postoperative angiogram after removal of large arteriovenous malformations located distant from the arterial circle of Willis.
          Neurosurgery. 1993; 33: 400-406
          • Spetzler R.F.
          • Wilson C.B.
          • Weinstein P.
          • Hehdorn H.
          • Townsend J.
          Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory.
          Clin Neurosurg. 1978; 25: 651-672
          • Hongo K.
          • Kobayashi S.
          • Takemae T.
          Arteriovenous malformation.
          in: Kobayashi S. Goel A. Hongo K. Neurosurgery of complex tumors and vascular lesions. Churchill Livingstone,, Edinburgh,1997: 127-138
          • Spetzler R.F.
          • Martin N.A.
          A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.
          J Neurosurg. 1986; 65: 476-483
          • de Oliveira E.
          • Tedeschi H.
          • Siqueira M.G.
          • Ono M.
          • Rhoton A.L.
          Arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia region: rationale for surgical management.
          Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997; 139: 487-506
          • Batjer H.H.
          • Devous Sr, M.D.
          • Meyer Y.J.
          • Purdy P.D.
          • Samson D.S.
          Cerebrovascular hemodynamics in arteriovenous malformation complicated by normal perfusion pressure breakthrough.
          Neurosurgery. 1988; 22: 503-509
          • Morgan M.K.
          • Sundt Jr, T.M.
          The case against staged operative resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
          Neurosurgery. 1989; 25: 429-435
          • Sorimachi T.
          • Koike T.
          • Takeuchi S.
          • Minakawa T.
          • Abe H.
          • Nishimaki K.
          • Ito Y.
          • Tanaka R.
          Embolisation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations achieved with polyvinyl alcohol particles: angiographic reappearance and complications.
          Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20: 1323-1328
          • Day A.L.
          • Friedman W.A.
          • Sypert G.W.
          • Mickle J.P.
          Successful treatment of the normal perfusion pressure breakthrough syndrome.
          Neurosurgery. 1982; 11: 625-630